Value and Validation of Small Scale Physical Model Tests of Floating Wave Energy Converters

Forestier, J-M.; Holmes, B.; Barrett, S.; Lewis, A. (2007). Value and Validation of Small Scale Physical Model Tests of Floating Wave Energy Converters. Paper presented at 7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC 2007), Porto, Portugal.

@conference{Forestier-2007-10850,
author = {Forestier, J-M and Holmes, B and Barrett, S and Lewis, A},
title = {Value and Validation of Small Scale Physical Model Tests of Floating Wave Energy Converters},
year = {2007},
month = {sep},
series = {7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC 2007)},
pages = {10},
address = {Porto, Portugal},
publisher = {European Tidal and Wave Energy Conference},
url = {https://ewtec.org/proceedings/},
keywords = {Wave, Lab Data, Modeling, Mooring, Condition Monitoring, Survivability},
}

Export Citation to BibTex

TY - CONF
TI - Value and Validation of Small Scale Physical Model Tests of Floating Wave Energy Converters
AU - Forestier, J-M
AU - Holmes, B
AU - Barrett, S
AU - Lewis, A
T2 - 7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC 2007)
C1 - Porto, Portugal
AB - This article describes the specifics of WEC physical testing compared to offshore platform testing and exposes the reasons of performing initial tests at small scales. The first difference is that WECs have larger and thus more nonlinear motions. These large amplitudes of motions imply the necessity of a rigorous representation of the rotation of the device. The second difference is the definite influence on the PTO on the WEC motions. The PTO has therefore to be physically modeled. The third difference is in the mooring philosophy: in case of floating WECs, the mooring is to be designed to give the maximal freedom of motion to the devices, which is not usually the case for offshore platforms. WEC design is today not an established technique; the uncertain points still have to be assessed with a sufficient level of confidence. This implies their physical testing at the preliminary study stage at small scales and subsequently their physical testing at larger scales. The testing of the OE Buoy WEC at these larger scales validated the results obtained at small scales.
DA - 2007/09//
PY - 2007
SP - 10
PB - European Tidal and Wave Energy Conference
UR - https://ewtec.org/proceedings/
LA - English
KW - Wave
KW - Lab Data
KW - Modeling
KW - Mooring
KW - Condition Monitoring
KW - Survivability
ER -

Export Citation to RIS

Abstract

This article describes the specifics of WEC physical testing compared to offshore platform testing and exposes the reasons of performing initial tests at small scales. The first difference is that WECs have larger and thus more nonlinear motions. These large amplitudes of motions imply the necessity of a rigorous representation of the rotation of the device. The second difference is the definite influence on the PTO on the WEC motions. The PTO has therefore to be physically modeled. The third difference is in the mooring philosophy: in case of floating WECs, the mooring is to be designed to give the maximal freedom of motion to the devices, which is not usually the case for offshore platforms. WEC design is today not an established technique; the uncertain points still have to be assessed with a sufficient level of confidence. This implies their physical testing at the preliminary study stage at small scales and subsequently their physical testing at larger scales. The testing of the OE Buoy WEC at these larger scales validated the results obtained at small scales.