Abstract
Wave energy arrays are essential for reducing the Levelised Cost of Energy, yet the performance of traditional mono-device arrays is often limited by destructive hydrodynamic interactions and directional sensitivity. This work focuses on ”mixed arrays,” wherein different types and geometries of wave energy converters operating in different degrees of freedom (point Absorber and a flap) are deployed within the same array to exploit complementary device dynamics, whilst reducing spatial requirements. Using a weakly non-linear frequency-domain model utilising the solver HAMS-MREL, a systematic comparison is performed across 3360 cases considering varying array sizes, spacings, wave directions, and control strategies (active and passive). Comparison of array performance is based on the well known q-factor and a new geometry dependent metric (M-factor). The results demonstrate that mixed arrays can outperform mono-device arrays by leveraging favourable hydrodynamic cross-coupling and radiated wave-field alignment. For a 10-device staggered configuration, mixed arrays achieved a peak q-factor of 1.6 and an M-factor of 2.25 under regular waves, showing a 175% increase in point absorber heave response under displacement constraints and 34% increase in flap excitation forces. Performance is sensitive to the spacing-to-wavelength ratio, mixed arrays exhibit superior directional robustness, and reduced efficiency collapse compared to mono-flap arrays. The findings suggest that mixed-device configurations can provide a robust alternative for optimising energy capture, reducing spatial requirements, offering new collaboration opportunities and contributing to the viability of wave energy arrays.